When to use underwritable

Three moments that decide a deal

Sourcing triage, the pre-LOI call, the full CDD before the IC:
the finished work at each of them

Test us on your target

02Outside-in Review

Promising on paper, but does the market story hold up?

An evidence-grounded outside-in view: it validates the investment case and shows where deeper diligence is needed.

OutcomeA proceed-or-pass call before the LOI, with the evidence and the gates still open.

in daystypical turnaround

What you get

  • Market size and growth dynamics
  • Competitive landscape and positioning
  • Demand drivers and customer segments
  • Key risks and investment hypotheses, source-bound

What stands behind a verdict

The same four kinds behind every stage.
AI reads them, CDD experts weigh them.

  • Public record

    Registries, filings, analyst and market research.

  • Licensed data

    Market and company databases, beyond the open web.

  • Expert interviews

    Industry insiders on the questions the data can't answer. They never hear the target's name.

  • Our own sector research

    Built up deal by deal from outside-in sources, never from client material.

Commercial due diligence you can check

A chat prompt answers a question.
A deal needs sources, a challenge and a signature.

Range and depth

The whole market and the asset, not one angle

Sourced, line by line

Every claim named, every source graded for reliability

Signed, not generated

A market expert checks it, a CDD expert signs it

Tested against itself

Counter-evidence searched for, not left out

A verdict, not a summary

What it means for the deal, and which gates remain open

Your deal stays yours

Client material never feeds our sector research

What deal teams ask first

Straight answers on sources, validation, confidentiality and price

Where does the evidence come from?

Registries, filings, market and analyst research, and expert input, not just the open web. Every source is weighted for reliability before it counts, and every claim in the report links to a named source.

What if the AI gets it wrong?

That risk is engineered against, twice. The engine stress-tests every claim against counter-evidence, and human sector experts validate the judgment calls before delivery. And because every claim links to its source, your team can verify any statement in one click.

Who sees my target?

Your brief stays confidential: NDA by default, EU-hosted infrastructure, no logos, no case studies, no reference to your pipeline without your written consent.

Does anything we share train your models?

No. Your targets, your hypotheses and your documents stay inside your engagement, and nothing you share ever trains anyone else's view. Our model and research providers are bound as processors under Art. 28 GDPR and contractually barred from training on your content; the infrastructure is EU-hosted. What does compound across deals is our own sector research, built from outside-in sources that are public to begin with, never your material.

Why not run it ourselves with a chat prompt?

A prompt gives you generic model knowledge in one pass. A diligence engine gives you fixed structure, counter-evidence, source weighting, expert validation and consistency across every deal, plus a result your IC can audit.

How is this different from a data platform?

Data platforms hand you the raw material, and the work is still yours. We deliver the finished judgment: a recommendation with the evidence behind it.

What does it cost?

A fixed price per deliverable, agreed before we start. Target Screen, Outside-in Review and underwritable CDD are priced separately, and each extends into the next on the same evidence base.

Tell us your target.
We'll tell you if it's underwritable

It starts with a conversation on your questions, scope and price. You commission only after that.

A codename is enough to start. No IM needed.